https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122992
--- Comment #28 from Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Kevin Stefanov from comment #27) > Thank you for catching that, explaining and for the fix. I was not aware of > it. Would adding a bootstrap step with a cross compiler that targets arm64 > have allowed me to catch that myself, even if that wouldn't let me run the > testsuite? Is that something I should be doing when validating my future > patches? So I thought Linaro's testing from patchworks would have failed but it looks like it is passing: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/[email protected]/ A cross compiler to aarch64 would not have found the issue here. There are some aarch64 machines you can use from the compilefarm though: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm This is what I used to finally test the patch.
