------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 19:20 ------- (In reply to comment #5)
> But that is not sufficient. We are overflowing work_stack, when we really > shouldn't. I'm looking into this now. > I was wrong. It is indeed possible for WORK_STACK to have more than N_BASIC_BLOCKS used. For each block B with a definition for VAR, we add blocks in B's DFS to the stack. Steven's patch is almost right, but we also need to pass WORK_STACK by reference. Patch in testing. Diego. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18712
