------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-04 17:54 ------- tree remove redundant PHIs: 0.34 ( 2%) usr 0.02 ( 0%) sys 0.34 ( 1%) wall tree SSA rewrite : 0.42 ( 3%) usr 0.06 ( 1%) sys 0.62 ( 3%) wall tree SSA other : 0.88 ( 6%) usr 0.61 ( 9%) sys 1.39 ( 6%) wall tree operand scan : 0.45 ( 3%) usr 0.64 (10%) sys 1.51 ( 6%) wall dominator optimization: 0.86 ( 6%) usr 0.05 ( 1%) sys 0.83 ( 3%) wall tree alias analysis : 0.19 ( 1%) usr 0.01 ( 0%) sys 0.25 ( 1%) wall tree PHI insertion : 0.23 ( 2%) usr 0.02 ( 0%) sys 0.24 ( 1%) wall
expand : 0.72 ( 5%) usr 0.08 ( 1%) sys 0.91 ( 4%) wall I wounder how expand is this slow, it might be just again counting more than just expand here (again). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17278
