------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-22
19:18 -------
That may all be true, but the fact is that you're now talking about
missed-optimizations, and not a real compile time hog. Yes we can
win. No, this is not a hog anymore, it's just not as good as it
could be. You're also talking about RTL, not tree jump threading.
In fact I think it's plain wrong to keep this bug open. It's just
keeping the number of real regressions artificially high. We have
compile time slowdowns, and that's a regression. But we don't need
to keep bugs open when the issue of that bug was been fixed.
I suggest someone updates the summary and keywords to reflect the
actual status of the bug, or close this one and open a new one for
the basically unrelated issues Jeff mentioned
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2004-07-27 18:04:40 |2004-12-22 19:18:03
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15524
