On 03/17/2011 04:46 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
PING, ok for 4.7?
Did you have a response to my comment below?
2011/1/4 Jason Merrill<ja...@redhat.com>:
On 01/01/2011 01:07 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Well, as here no further agreement was found, I post here the
alternative suggested by Joseph. I am open-minded which approach will
be chosen. I just want to fix this long pending issue.
I split up this patch in two parts. The first simply extends the
struct attribute_spec by new member 'on_diagnostic' and extends the
the uses of this structure by this new field. This new member
specifies if the attribute shall be show on diagnostic output, or not.
This seems like a reasonable approach, but I'd prefer to describe/name the
field as indicating that the attribute affects type compatibility (since
that's why we want to see the attribute in diagnostics), and making the
default comp_type_attributes use that information.
