On 04/26/2011 06:57 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
I considered just changing -g1 to do this, with the argument that "enough for making backtraces" ought to include line numbers and inlined function calls, but I wasn't familiar enough with existing uses of -g1 to go with that alternative. I'm certainly willing to go that route, though, if that's preferable.
That makes sense to me; it seems appropriate for -g1 to have information that makes a backtrace more informative, but not information for interactive debugging. Jim, do you have an opinion?
Jason
