On 13 May 2011 20:46, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Why did you put this before the invalid template-id check, rather than
> after?
For no particular reason. Is it significant?
> Also, shouldn't we reject "override" on classes?
You can have stuff like
struct blah override{};
where struct blah is an elaborate-type-specifier, and override is a
variable name.
How do I tell the difference, or more precisely, how do I know when a
class is being defined for
the first time?
> The test should include a class template marked final.
Ok, I'll fix these issues, any guidance for the override question
above is highly appreciated.
