Re: [PATCH] C++0x, implement final on classes

[Jason Merrill]

On 05/14/2011 06:49 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/14/2011 02:19 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Cool, thanks! I'm not quite sure whether there are ambiguities in the
case
of elaborate-specifiers, but I suppose those can be fixed later.

Good point. In the case that
!cp_parser_next_token_starts_class_definition_p, we should rewind to
before what we parsed as virt-specifiers.

cp_lexer_token_position and cp_lexer_set_token_position should be useful 
for this.

Jason