On 06/20/2011 09:22 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > builtins.c:expand_builtin_lock_test_and_set (enum machine_mode mode, tree exp, > builtins.c: case BUILT_IN_LOCK_TEST_AND_SET_1: > builtins.c: case BUILT_IN_LOCK_TEST_AND_SET_2: > builtins.c: case BUILT_IN_LOCK_TEST_AND_SET_4: > > whereas everything else is 'sync_lock_test_and_set'.. > > So i guess it falls to prior art... I assume Aldy just cut-and-pasted > for his new routine and just changed the names in the same format.
Heh. So this is really my fault. Ah well. > Ah, even better. For some reason I thought I saw somewhere that it > wasn't a full barrier. Might have just been the documentation for > lock_test_and_set. Very likely. r~
