Ping?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 4:05 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3, ARM, libgcc, ping5] Code size optimization for
> the fmul/fdiv and dmul/ddiv function in libgcc
>
> [Taking over Tony's patch]
>
> Ping?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Tony Wang
> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:15 AM
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/3,ARM,libgcc]Code size optimization for the
> fmul/fdiv
> > and dmul/ddiv function in libgcc
> >
> > Step 2: Mark all the symbols around the fragment boundaries as
> function
> > symbols, so as to generate veneer when
> > the two section is too far away from each other. Also, I have both
> > manually and using some test cases to
> > verify that IP and PSR are not alive at such point.
> >
> > gcc/libgcc/ChangeLog:
> > 2014-8-21 Tony Wang <tony.w...@arm.com>
> >
> > * config/arm/ieee754-sf.S: Expose symbols around fragment
> > boundaries as function symbols.
> > * config/arm/ieee754-df.S: Same with above
> >
> > BR,
> > Tony
>
>
>
