On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratoch...@redhat.com> wrote: > [...] > It is wrong that gcc puts -fpreprocessed into DW_AT_producer - I may post a > gcc > patch for it.
Hi. I wasn't aware there are now rules for what can and cannot go in DW_AT_producer. DW_AT_producer has gone from being informational to having a formal spec (in the sense that something will break if, for example, a particular option is mentioned). Is this spec written down somewhere? [At least guidelines for what things may lead to breakage?]
