On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:50:40 +0100, Doug Evans wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jan Kratochvil > <jan.kratoch...@redhat.com> wrote: > > [...] > > It is wrong that gcc puts -fpreprocessed into DW_AT_producer - I may post a > > gcc > > patch for it. > > Hi. > I wasn't aware there are now rules for what can and cannot go in > DW_AT_producer. > DW_AT_producer has gone from being informational to having a formal > spec (in the sense that something will break if, for example, a > particular option is mentioned). > Is this spec written down somewhere? [At least guidelines for what > things may lead to breakage?]
No. Do you have a suggestion where to put it? Should it be only a GNU extension or should it be even DWARF-standardized? Jan