On 2/11/2015 1:22 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> When building Ada for RTEMS, you need to pass in the CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET
>> to see OS specific .h files. This was already done for the RTS but needed to
>> be added to the process which extracts value settings from the .h files.
>>
>> This patch is against 4.9.  OK to apply to 4.8, 4.9, and head assuming it
>> applies cleanly?
> This patch won't apply cleanly for head I think, where I suspect at least
> part of your patch is OBE.
OK. Rebuilding on the head.
> It would be better to first have a patch for trunk (if still relevant)
> and then backport it to the other branches, since changes on trunk have
> already been done in a different way to address at least partly this issue
> (e.g. use of GNATLIBCFLAGS_FOR_C in OSCONS_CPP, different computation of
> OSCONS_CC).
I am happy to do and from your description it sounds like the it would
have built
if the code had my previous patch to add CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET to the
GNATLIBCFLAGS.

GNATLIBCFLAGS_FOR_C = -W -Wall $(GNATLIBCFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET) \
        -fexceptions -DIN_RTS -DHAVE_GETIPINFO

But the build didn't get far enough to know. It fails before that with:

gcc -c -g -O2  -gnatpg -gnata -W -Wall -nostdinc -I- -I. -Iada/generated
-Iada -I/users/joel/test-gcc/gcc/gcc/ada
-I/users/joel/test-gcc/gcc/gcc/ada/gcc-interface
/users/joel/test-gcc/gcc/gcc/ada/a-ioexce.ads -o ada/a-ioexce.o
a-ioexce.ads:21:19: violation of restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" at
system.ads:53
a-ioexce.ads:22:19: violation of restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" at
system.ads:53
a-ioexce.ads:23:19: violation of restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" at
system.ads:53
a-ioexce.ads:24:19: violation of restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" at
system.ads:53
a-ioexce.ads:25:19: violation of restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" at
system.ads:53
a-ioexce.ads:26:19: violation of restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" at
system.ads:53
a-ioexce.ads:27:19: violation of restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" at
system.ads:53
a-ioexce.ads:28:19: violation of restriction "No_Elaboration_Code" at
system.ads:53

Any ideas?

My native compiler is from the head back in August. I will rebuild it
overnight
and try again in the morning in case that's a factor.

> Arno

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985


Reply via email to