Ping. This is for case failures and it doesn't affect normal compilation, so I suppose it's fine for this stage?
Thanks, bin On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > This patch is the first part fixing memset-inline-{4,5,6,8,9}.c failures on > cortex-a9. GCC/arm doesn't generate any tuning information in assembly, it > can't tell whether we are compiling for cortex-a9 tune if the compiler is > configured so by default. > This patch introduces a new (target dependent) option "-mprint-tune-info". > It prints CPU tuning information as comment in assembler file, thus DEJAGNU > can check it and make decisions. By default the option is disabled, so it > won't change current behaviors. For now, pointers in tune structure are not > printed, we should improve that and output more useful information in the > long run. > > Another patch is followed adding DEJAGNU test function and adapting test > strings. > > Build and test on arm-none-eabi, is it OK? > > 2015-03-06 Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@arm.com> > > * config/arm/arm.opt (print_tune_info): New option. > * config/arm/arm.c (arm_print_tune_info): New function. > (arm_file_start): Call arm_print_tune_info. > * config/arm/arm-protos.h (struct tune_params): Add comment. > * doc/invoke.texi (@item -mprint-tune-info): New item. > (-mtune): mention it in ARM Option Summary.