Hi, It was recently pointed out that we still don't have a separate baseline_symbols.txt for powerpc64le-linux-gnu. This patch modifies configure.host to create a new abi_baseline_pair for powerpc64le and provides the generated symbol file (from "make new-abi-baseline").
Is this ok for stage4, or should I hold it until after 5.1 branches? (Apologies for attempting to send the whole file -- didn't see how large it was...) Thanks, Bill 2015-04-06 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> * config/abi/post/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: New baseline symbols file. * configure.host: Add separate case for powerpc64le. Index: libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt =================================================================== --- libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt (revision 0) +++ libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,5595 @@ ...too long to post... Index: libstdc++-v3/configure.host =================================================================== --- libstdc++-v3/configure.host (revision 221884) +++ libstdc++-v3/configure.host (working copy) @@ -338,9 +338,12 @@ case "${host}" in mips64*) abi_baseline_pair=mips64-linux-gnu ;; - powerpc64*) + powerpc64) abi_baseline_pair=powerpc64-linux-gnu ;; + powerpc64le) + abi_baseline_pair=powerpc64le-linux-gnu + ;; s390) abi_baseline_pair=s390-linux-gnu ;;