On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 08:39:37AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: >> Posted below the differences from powerpc64-linux-gnu. A surprising >> number of additional symbols, but none are missing in the new baseline. >> (Perhaps powerpc64-linux-gnu needs updating?) > > Sure, it needs updating. > > So, if I filter the GLIBCXX_3.4.21 and CXXABI_1.3.9 symbols from your diff, > I get > grep -v '@@GLIBCXX_3.4.21\|@@CXXABI_1.3.9' /tmp/XX | grep @ >> TLS:8:_ZSt11__once_call@@GLIBCXX_3.4.11 >> TLS:8:_ZSt15__once_callable@@GLIBCXX_3.4.11 > > which are the two lines you should manually remove. > But then, it means the powerpc64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu > baseline_symbols.txt are identical, so the question is if we really need > to duplicate it, instead of just telling in the configury that for > powerpc64le-linux-gnu it should use the powerpc64-linux-gnu > baseline_symbols.txt.
I thought that they are using the same baseline_symbols.txt at the moment and Bill's patch explicitly separates them in configure. If the files are identical, then no need to separate them and no need for the patch. If/when they diverge for a good reason (IEEE long double?), we can revisit the patch. Thanks, David
