On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Christian Bruel <christian.br...@st.com> > wrote: >> While trying to reduce the PR64835 case for ARM and x86, I noticed that the >> alignment flags are cleared for x86 when attribute optimized is used. >> >> With the attached testcases, the visible effects are twofold : >> >> 1) Functions compiled in with attribute optimize (-O2) are not aligned as if >> they were with the -O2 flag. >> >> 2) can_inline_edge_p fails because opts_for_fn (caller->decl) != opts_for_fn >> (callee->decl)) even-though they are compiled with the same optimization >> level. > > 2015-02-06 Christian Bruel <christian.br...@st.com> > > PR target/64835 > * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_default_align): New function. > (ix86_override_options_after_change): Call ix86_default_align. > (TARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS_AFTER_CHANGE): New hook. > (ix86_override_options_after_change): New function. > > 2015-02-06 Christian Bruel <christian.br...@st.com> > > PR target/64835 > * gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c: New test. > * gcc.target/i386/iinline-attr-2.c: New test. > > OK for mainline.
Hi Christian, I noticed case gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c failed on aarch64. The original patch is x86 specific, while the case is added as general one. Could you please have a look at this? FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test" Thanks, bin > > Thanks, > Uros
