> -----Original Message----- > From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 3:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Anatoly Sokolov; Denis Chertykov; Weddington, Eric; Richard Henderson > Subject: [Patch,AVR]: PR49687 (better widening 32-bit mul) > > Eric, can you review the assembler routines and say if such reuse is ok > or if you'd prefer a speed-optimized version of __mulsi3 like in the > current libgcc?
Hi Johann, Typically a penalty on speed is preferred over a penalty on code size. Do you already have information on how it compares on code size with the old routines? Eric
