Jeff> In the past this has stalled on issues like how will asynch-exceptions Jeff> be tested and the like.
It seems to me that either there is some other language which needs this -- in which case that language ought to have testing for the feature -- or the feature is only used by gcj, in which case it doesn't matter. Of course is!=ought; but relying on gcj and libjava to provide this small amount of testing seems like a bad cost/benefit tradeoff. Tom
