On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Tom Tromey <t...@tromey.com> wrote: > Jeff> In the past this has stalled on issues like how will asynch-exceptions > Jeff> be tested and the like. > > It seems to me that either there is some other language which needs this > -- in which case that language ought to have testing for the feature -- > or the feature is only used by gcj, in which case it doesn't matter. > > Of course is!=ought; but relying on gcj and libjava to provide this > small amount of testing seems like a bad cost/benefit tradeoff.
Go does use asynchronous exceptions, and has test cases that rely on them working. Ian
