Neither test mention below has a chance to ever pass on i386-*-freebsd* without a rewrite of the testecases. So, I've xfailed both.
2015-09-29 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org> gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_4.f90: xfail on i386-*-freebsd* gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: ditto. Index: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_4.f90 =================================================================== --- gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_4.f90 (revision 228261) +++ gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_4.f90 (working copy) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -! { dg-do run } +! { dg-do run { xfail i386-*-freebsd* } } use :: ieee_arithmetic implicit none Index: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 =================================================================== --- gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 (revision 228261) +++ gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 (working copy) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -! { dg-do run } +! { dg-do run { xfail i386-*-freebsd* } } ! { dg-add-options ieee } ! { dg-skip-if "PR libfortran/58015" { hppa*-*-hpux* } } ! { dg-skip-if "IBM long double 31 bits of precision, test requires 38" { powerpc*-*-linux* } } -- Steve