Neither test mention below has a chance to ever pass
on i386-*-freebsd* without a rewrite of the testecases.
So, I've xfailed both.
2015-09-29 Steven G. Kargl <ka...@gcc.gnu.org>
gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_4.f90: xfail on i386-*-freebsd*
gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: ditto.
Index: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_4.f90
===================================================================
--- gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_4.f90 (revision 228261)
+++ gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_4.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-do run { xfail i386-*-freebsd* } }
use :: ieee_arithmetic
implicit none
Index: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90
===================================================================
--- gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 (revision 228261)
+++ gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-do run { xfail i386-*-freebsd* } }
! { dg-add-options ieee }
! { dg-skip-if "PR libfortran/58015" { hppa*-*-hpux* } }
! { dg-skip-if "IBM long double 31 bits of precision, test requires 38" {
powerpc*-*-linux* } }
--
Steve
