On October 21, 2015 6:04:38 PM GMT+02:00, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> wrote: >On 10/21/2015 05:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> The problem is the existing ENABLE_CHECKING conditions. >> >> Anything which is #ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING will have its behavior >changed >> if we change things so that ENABLE_CHECKING is always defined with a >value. >> >> So if we wanted to continue to use ENABLE_CHECKING, but with a value, >> then every #ifdef has to be fixed all-at-once. > >But why change it to have a value? Just keep it as-is, and use >flag_checking for runtime tests.
The goal is to get rid of conditional compilation. Richard. > >Bernd
