On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:42:37PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Rich Felker wrote: > > > musl explicitly does not support using a mix of libc headers and > > compiler-provided freestanding headers. While there may be > > In that case the GCC ports for musl should define USER_H = > $(EXTRA_HEADERS) like t-openbsd does. (Of course that won't work for > multilib builds supporting different C libraries with different > multilibs.)
This sounds interesting. Are there practical ways it's a better solution than what linux.h is doing now for musl? Inability to support multilib well is something I've wondered if we could improve on, but from what you said it sounds like this wouldn't help. Rich
