On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Rich Felker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:42:37PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Rich Felker wrote: > > > > > musl explicitly does not support using a mix of libc headers and > > > compiler-provided freestanding headers. While there may be > > > > In that case the GCC ports for musl should define USER_H = > > $(EXTRA_HEADERS) like t-openbsd does. (Of course that won't work for > > multilib builds supporting different C libraries with different > > multilibs.) > > This sounds interesting. Are there practical ways it's a better > solution than what linux.h is doing now for musl? Inability to support
Well, it ensures the installed compiler can't find the freestanding headers at all, because they're not installed (other than architecture-specific intrinsics headers). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
