On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:10:29PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 16/02/16 11:04, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:56:58AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > >>>AFAIU, it's not a release regression given that: > >>>- this has failed since 4.9.0, and > >>>- the test-case is not supported in 4.8, > >>>so we're not required to fix it in 4.9 and 5 branches. > >>> > >>>But, the test-case does fail in 5 and 4.9 branches, and the fix seems > >>>simple > >>>enough to not have the risk of introducing breakage in the release > >>>branches. > >>> > >>>OK for 4.9/5 branch? > >Okay. > > > > Hmm, it doesn't apply cleanly. > > The trunk version of simd_clone_create also contains: 'Fix ICE for SIMD > clones usage in LTO' ( > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00434.html ), which adds the > 'in_other_partition' propagation in simd_clone_create. > > That's also not a release regression (reproduces with 4.9.0 release, not > supported in 4.8), and still reproduces on 4.9 and 5 branches. > > OK to backport 'Fix ICE for SIMD clones usage in LTO' to 4.9/5 branch?
Ok. Jakub