On 03/29/2016 11:57 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Are we confident that arr[0] won't make it here as POINTER_PLUS_EXPR or some such?I'm as confident as I can be given that this is my first time working in this area. Which piece of code or what assumption in particular are you concerned about?
I want to be sure that we don't fold these conditions to false.
constexpr int *ip = 0;
constexpr struct A { int ar[3]; } *ap = 0;
static_assert(&ip[0] == 0);
static_assert(&(ap->ar[0]) == 0);
Jason
