> On 10 Jun 2016, at 01:28, Jim Wilson <jim.wil...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:56 AM, James Greenhalgh > <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote: >> As you're proposing to have this on by default, I'd like to give a chance >> to hear whether there is consensus as to this being the right choice for >> the thunderx, xgene1, exynos-m1 and qdf24xx subtargets.
Testing on XGene-1 and XGene-2 shows a small improvement (0.8% overall) on SPEC2006 and a negligible improvement for CoreMark, just in line with what we’d expect. So from our end, it’s a vote for “on by default”. Regards, Phil.
