Re: [PATCH] Amend dump expectation in slsr-8.c (PR, tree-optimization/71490)

[Jeff Law]

On 07/13/2016 08:47 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
As mentioned in [1], one slsr transformation is gone, thus we need to change 
expected number
of multiplications.

Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490#c5
Isn't that a code quality regression?  So instead shouldn't we be 
keeping the same expectation, but xfailing the test?

jeff