On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: > On 07/13/2016 07:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> Isn't that a code quality regression? So instead shouldn't we be keeping >> the same expectation, but xfailing the test? >> >> jeff > > Hello. > > Disabling a pass before slsr makes the test to catch both opportunities. > Is the patch fine?
No, this is still a code quality regression. What happens is that for some reason we fail to sink for GCC 6. Richard. > Thanks, > Martin
