Replies inline -- Thanks, Ayush Goel
On 17 July 2016 at 9:44:27 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez (lopeziba...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 16 July 2016 at 10:54, ayush goel wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the feedbacks. > > > > —> I’m already configuring gcc with multiple languages and multilib enabled > > > > —> The changes have been bootstrapped and regression tested (complete > > check, make > -k -j20 check). > > > > —> As mentioned, I have locally removed obstack.[ch] from libiberty and > > built and tested > the entire thing. > > > > PFA the patch > > This sounds great to me, but I cannot approve it. I hope some of the > people who can will comment on it. > > One thing that I miss is documenting gnulib in doc/sourcebuild.texi. I’ve added gnulib as an entry in sourcebuild.texi > It would be good to document in particular how to add a new module. > GDB has: > https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/DeveloperTips#Updating_GDB.27s_import_of_gnulib > > but I think this info should be in sourcebuild.texi (or somewhere else > under doc/). > This wiki pages talks mostly of how to update the version of gnulib present inside the gdb directory. I’ve instead created a gnulib-import.texi file inside /doc with bullet points on how to import a new module. > I see several other mentions of libiberty in doc/, but some of them > may be just using libiberty as an example, thus not relevant. > Yes, there are several other mentions of libiberty (in contrib.texi, install.texi, invoke.texi etc) however these are not relevant to us. I’m attaching a patch just containing the changes made in the /doc. Once these are approved by the community, I’ll add them to the main patch and resubmit it. PFA > Cheers, > > Manuel. >
gcc_doc.patch
Description: Binary data
