On 10/06/2011 03:02 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
On the x86 (with Fedora 13), I built and tested the C, C++, Objective C, Java,
Ada,
and Go languages with no regressions
On a power6 box with RHEL 6.1, I
have done the same for C, C++, Objective C, Java, and Ada languages with no
regressions.
Any reason for not building and testing Fortran? Especially as you patch
gcc/fortran/{trans*.c,f95-lang.c}?
Tobias
[gcc/fortran]
2011-10-05 Michael Meissner<meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_power_op): Delete old interface with two
parallel arrays to hold standard builtin declarations, and replace
it with a function based interface that can support creating
builtins on the fly in the future. Change all uses, and poison
the old names. Make sure 0 is not a legitimate builtin index.
(fill_with_spaces): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_string_copy): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_zero_assign): Ditto.
(gfc_build_memcpy_call): Ditto.
(alloc_scalar_allocatable_for_assignment): Ditto.
* trans-array.c (gfc_trans_array_constructor_value): Ditto.
(duplicate_allocatable): Ditto.
(gfc_alloc_allocatable_for_assignment): Ditto.
* trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_clause_copy_ctor): Ditto.
(gfc_omp_clause_assign_op): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_omp_atomic): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_omp_do): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_omp_task): Ditto.
* trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_stop): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_sync): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_allocate): Ditto.
(gfc_trans_deallocate): Ditto.
* trans.c (gfc_call_malloc): Ditto.
(gfc_allocate_using_malloc): Ditto.
(gfc_call_free): Ditto.
(gfc_deallocate_with_status): Ditto.
(gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status): Ditto.
* f95-lang.c (gfc_define_builtin): Ditto.
(gfc_init_builtin_functions): Ditto.
* trans-decl.c (create_main_function): Ditto.
* trans-intrinsic.c (builtin_decl_for_precision): Ditto.
