On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Michael Meissner
<meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 10:44:03AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> > On 10/06/2011 03:02 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
>> > >On the x86 (with Fedora 13), I built and tested the C, C++, Objective C,
>> > >Java, Ada,
>> > >and Go languages with no regressions
>> >
>> > >On a power6 box with RHEL 6.1, I
>> > >have done the same for C, C++, Objective C, Java, and Ada languages with
>> > >no
>> > >regressions.
>> >
>> > Any reason for not building and testing Fortran? Especially as you
>> > patch gcc/fortran/{trans*.c,f95-lang.c}?
>> >
>> > Tobias
>>
>> Brain fault on my part. I tested the previous set of patches with Fortran.
>> Since I had to explicitly add the languages to pick up Ada and Go, I seemed
>> to
>> have dropped Fortran. Sigh. Sorry about that. I just started the powerpc
>> bootstrap, since that is a lot faster.
>
> I'm enclosing the revised patches that now provides the Fortran fixes as well.
> It passes bootstrap and make check on powerpc64-linux based on subversion id
> 179514. The current top of the tree doesn't bootstrap on x86 if I build go
> due
> to an issue with shrinkwrapping and split stack.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
