"Tsimbalist, Igor V" <igor.v.tsimbal...@intel.com> writes: > Enable building libbacktrace with CET options. > > libbacktrace/ > * configure.ac: Add CET_FLAGS to EXTRA_FLAGS. > * aclocal.m4: Regenerate. > * Makefile.in: Likewise. > * configure: Likewise.
> +if test x$enable_cet = xyes; then > + CET_FLAGS="-fcf-protection -mcet -include cet.h" > +fi Is this really right? Why the -include option? CET protection sounds like it should work for any language, but -include is C-specific and doesn't seem to have anything to do with code generation. Of course, for libbacktrace, that is a generated file. The patch to libbacktrace/configure.ac is fine if the general approach is approved. Ian
