On 10/12/2017 05:58 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > "Tsimbalist, Igor V" <igor.v.tsimbal...@intel.com> writes: > >> Enable building libbacktrace with CET options. >> >> libbacktrace/ >> * configure.ac: Add CET_FLAGS to EXTRA_FLAGS. >> * aclocal.m4: Regenerate. >> * Makefile.in: Likewise. >> * configure: Likewise. > >> +if test x$enable_cet = xyes; then >> + CET_FLAGS="-fcf-protection -mcet -include cet.h" >> +fi > > Is this really right? Why the -include option? CET protection sounds > like it should work for any language, but -include is C-specific and > doesn't seem to have anything to do with code generation. Agreed. And more generally it seems that we want to be able to just use the -f/-m options to enable/disable CET checking. If we're having to include additional files to get CET support, then we need to go back and rethink things somewhere.
Jeff
