> An and:DI is cheaper than a zero_extend:DI of an and:SI. That depends strongly on the constants and whether the machine is 32-bit or 64-bit.
But that's irrelevant in this case since the and:SI will be removed (it reflects what already been done).
> An and:DI is cheaper than a zero_extend:DI of an and:SI. That depends strongly on the constants and whether the machine is 32-bit or 64-bit.
But that's irrelevant in this case since the and:SI will be removed (it reflects what already been done).