On 3/9/18 4:25 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 3/9/18 1:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:50:41PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote: >>> This passed bootstrap and regtesting on powerpc64-linux, running the >>> testsuite in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes with no regressions. >>> Ok for trunk? >> >> Sorry this took a while to review. It is okay for trunk. Does this >> need backports? > > Technically, it is broken there too, but until trunk, we never really > generated the altivec mems that trigger this bug, so I think I would > lean towards just having this on trunk and if someone, somehow hits > it, then we can back port it then.
So as we talked offline, the go test case in PR85436 is fixed by this patch, so I have back ported it and am bootstrapping and regtesting it. Is it ok for GCC 7 if the testing comes back clean? Peter
