On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:23:51PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 3/9/18 4:25 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > > On 3/9/18 1:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:50:41PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote: > >>> This passed bootstrap and regtesting on powerpc64-linux, running the > >>> testsuite in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes with no regressions. > >>> Ok for trunk? > >> > >> Sorry this took a while to review. It is okay for trunk. Does this > >> need backports? > > > > Technically, it is broken there too, but until trunk, we never really > > generated the altivec mems that trigger this bug, so I think I would > > lean towards just having this on trunk and if someone, somehow hits > > it, then we can back port it then. > > So as we talked offline, the go test case in PR85436 is fixed by this > patch, so I have back ported it and am bootstrapping and regtesting it. > Is it ok for GCC 7 if the testing comes back clean?
Certainly, thanks. Is it needed for GCC 6 as well? Okay for that too, if so. Segher
