This patch fixes an error in the code generation for vec_pack (vector double, 
vector double).  As previously implemented, this built-in function translates 
to the vpkudum instruction.

This patch causes vec_pack (vector double, vector double) to behave the same as 
vec_float2 for the same type signature, producing the vmrgow instruction on 
little-endian targets and the vmrgew instruction on big-endian targets.

This revision differs from the initial path submission in that it combines all 
of the new testing into two test programs, using target qualifiers on the dg 
scan-assembler-times directives.

This patch has bootstrapped and tested without regressions on 
powerpc64le-unknown-linux (both P8 and P9) and on powerpc-linux (P8 big-endian, 
both -m32 and -m64).

Is this ok for the trunk?

gcc/ChangeLog:

2018-06-19  Kelvin Nilsen  <kel...@gcc.gnu.org>

        * config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (altivec_overloaded_builtins): Change
        behavior of vec_pack (vector double, vector double) to match
        behavior of vec_float2 (vector double, vector double).

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2018-06-19  Kelvin Nilsen  <kel...@gcc.gnu.org>

        * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p8.c (test_pack_float): Remove
        this test.
        * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-9.c: New test.
        * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-double.c: Modify dg directives
        to expect different code generation on big-endian
        vs. little-endian targets.

Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c        (revision 261341)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c        (working copy)
@@ -2425,7 +2425,7 @@ const struct altivec_builtin_types altivec_overloa
     RS6000_BTI_unsigned_V4SI, RS6000_BTI_unsigned_V2DI, 
RS6000_BTI_unsigned_V2DI, 0 },
   { ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_VEC_PACK, P8V_BUILTIN_VPKUDUM,
     RS6000_BTI_bool_V4SI, RS6000_BTI_bool_V2DI, RS6000_BTI_bool_V2DI, 0 },
-  { ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_VEC_PACK, P8V_BUILTIN_VPKUDUM,
+  { ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_VEC_PACK, P8V_BUILTIN_FLOAT2_V2DF,
     RS6000_BTI_V4SF, RS6000_BTI_V2DF, RS6000_BTI_V2DF, 0 },
 
   { P8V_BUILTIN_VEC_NEG, P8V_BUILTIN_NEG_V16QI,
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p8.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p8.c    (revision 261341)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p8.c    (working copy)
@@ -11,12 +11,6 @@ test_eq_long_long (vector bool long long x, vector
        return vec_cmpeq (x, y);
 }
 
-vector float
-test_pack_float (vector double x, vector double y)
-{
-  return vec_pack (x, y);
-}
-
 vector unsigned char
 test_vsi_packs_vusi_vusi (vector unsigned short x,
                           vector unsigned short y)
@@ -214,7 +208,6 @@ test_neg_double (vector double x)
 /* Expected test results:
 
      test_eq_long_long                         1 vcmpequd inst
-     test_pack_float                           1 vpkudum inst
      test_vsi_packs_vsll_vsll                  1 vpksdss
      test_vui_packs_vull_vull                  1 vpkudus
      test_vui_packs_vssi_vssi                  1 vpkshss
@@ -239,7 +232,6 @@ test_neg_double (vector double x)
  */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vcmpequd" 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpkudum"  1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpksdss"  1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpkudus"  1 } } */  
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpkuhus"  2 } } */
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-9.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-9.c       (nonexistent)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-9.c       (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p8vector_ok } */
+/* Expect same instruction selecton on p8 and above.  Fix if future
+   targets behave differently.  */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -maltivec" } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "do not override -mcpu" { powerpc*-*-* } { "-mcpu=*" } } */
+
+#include <altivec.h>
+
+vector float
+test_pack_float (vector double x, vector double y)
+{
+  return vec_pack (x, y);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmrgew" 1 { target be } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmrgow"  1 { target le } } } */
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xvcvdpsp"  2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xxpermdi"  2 } } */
+
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-double.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-double.c     (revision 
261341)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-double.c     (working copy)
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@
 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p8vector_ok } */
-/* { dg-options "-mvsx -mpower8-vector -O2" } */
+/* Expect same instruction selecton on p8 and above.  Fix if future
+   targets behave differently.  */
+/* { dg-options "-mvsx -O2" } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "do not override -mcpu" { powerpc*-*-* } { "-mcpu=*" } } */
 
 #include <altivec.h>
 
@@ -15,4 +18,5 @@ test_pack (vector double vd2, vector double vd3)
   return vec_pack (vd2, vd3);
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpkudum" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmrgew" 1 { target be } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmrgow"  1 { target le } } } */

Reply via email to