Hi Segher,

After waiting a few days for this newly committed patch to settle, is it ok to 
backport to gcc 6, gcc 7, and gcc 8?

Thanks.


On 6/22/18 5:34 PM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> Thanks for feedback.  It turns out that the vmrgew and vmrgow instructions 
> require power 8.
> 
> After coordinating with Segher on minor refinements to the test cases, I have 
> committed the patch as quoted below to the trunk.
> 
> On 6/19/18 5:37 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 01:37:51PM -0500, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
>>> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-9.c   (nonexistent)
>>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-9.c   (working copy)
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p8vector_ok } */
>>> +/* Expect same instruction selecton on p8 and above.  Fix if future
>>> +   targets behave differently.  */
>>> +/* { dg-options "-O3 -maltivec" } */
>>
>> But this doesn't use -mcpu=power8 or similar.  Does it need it anyway?
>> Both xxpermdi and xvcvdpsp are Power7 (ISA 2.06) and the rest is AltiVec?
>> So maybe just powerpc_vsx_ok?
>>
>>> +/* { dg-skip-if "do not override -mcpu" { powerpc*-*-* } { "-mcpu=*" } } */
>>
>> You do not use -mcpu= so you don't need this.
>>
>> Same issues in the next test.  Rest looks good though :-)
>>
>>
>> Segher
>>
>>
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2018-06-22  Kelvin Nilsen  <kel...@gcc.gnu.org>
> 
>       * config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (altivec_overloaded_builtins): Change
>       behavior of vec_pack (vector double, vector double) to match
>       behavior of vec_float2 (vector double, vector double).
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2018-06-22  Kelvin Nilsen  <kel...@gcc.gnu.org>
> 
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p8.c (test_pack_float): Remove
>       this test.
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-9.c: New test.
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-double.c: Modify dg directives
>       to expect different code generation on big-endian vs.
>       little-endian targets.
> 
> Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c      (revision 261775)
> +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c      (working copy)
> @@ -2425,7 +2425,7 @@ const struct altivec_builtin_types altivec_overloa
>      RS6000_BTI_unsigned_V4SI, RS6000_BTI_unsigned_V2DI, 
> RS6000_BTI_unsigned_V2DI, 0 },
>    { ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_VEC_PACK, P8V_BUILTIN_VPKUDUM,
>      RS6000_BTI_bool_V4SI, RS6000_BTI_bool_V2DI, RS6000_BTI_bool_V2DI, 0 },
> -  { ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_VEC_PACK, P8V_BUILTIN_VPKUDUM,
> +  { ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_VEC_PACK, P8V_BUILTIN_FLOAT2_V2DF,
>      RS6000_BTI_V4SF, RS6000_BTI_V2DF, RS6000_BTI_V2DF, 0 },
> 
>    { P8V_BUILTIN_VEC_NEG, P8V_BUILTIN_NEG_V16QI,
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p8.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p8.c  (revision 261775)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-p8.c  (working copy)
> @@ -11,12 +11,6 @@ test_eq_long_long (vector bool long long x, vector
>       return vec_cmpeq (x, y);
>  }
> 
> -vector float
> -test_pack_float (vector double x, vector double y)
> -{
> -  return vec_pack (x, y);
> -}
> -
>  vector unsigned char
>  test_vsi_packs_vusi_vusi (vector unsigned short x,
>                            vector unsigned short y)
> @@ -214,7 +208,6 @@ test_neg_double (vector double x)
>  /* Expected test results:
> 
>       test_eq_long_long                         1 vcmpequd inst
> -     test_pack_float                           1 vpkudum inst
>       test_vsi_packs_vsll_vsll                  1 vpksdss
>       test_vui_packs_vull_vull                  1 vpkudus
>       test_vui_packs_vssi_vssi                  1 vpkshss
> @@ -239,7 +232,6 @@ test_neg_double (vector double x)
>   */
> 
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vcmpequd" 1 } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpkudum"  1 } } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpksdss"  1 } } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpkudus"  1 } } */  
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpkuhus"  2 } } */
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-9.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-9.c     (nonexistent)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-9.c     (working copy)
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p8vector_ok } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "do not override -mcpu" { powerpc*-*-* } { "-mcpu=*" } { 
> "-mcpu=power8" } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-maltivec -mcpu=power8 -O3" } */
> +
> +#include <altivec.h>
> +
> +vector float
> +test_pack_float (vector double x, vector double y)
> +{
> +  return vec_pack (x, y);
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmrgew" 1 { target be } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmrgow"  1 { target le } } } */
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xvcvdpsp"  2 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xxpermdi"  2 } } */
> +
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-double.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-double.c   (revision 
> 261775)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-pack-double.c   (working copy)
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> 
>  /* { dg-do compile } */
>  /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p8vector_ok } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "do not override -mcpu" { powerpc*-*-* } { "-mcpu=*" } { 
> "-mcpu=power8" } } */
>  /* { dg-options "-mvsx -mpower8-vector -O2" } */
> 
>  #include <altivec.h>
> @@ -15,4 +16,5 @@ test_pack (vector double vd2, vector double vd3)
>    return vec_pack (vd2, vd3);
>  }
> 
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpkudum" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmrgew" 1 { target be } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmrgow"  1 { target le } } } */
> 
> 

Reply via email to