On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > What about the issues with libtool's notion of sysroots, as mentioned in > > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02037.html> - have those > > been resolved, and if so, how? And what about the directories only > > present in the src repository that will also need updating for such a > > toplevel change? > > Oops, you're right, libtools "with_sysroot" still clashes with gcc's > notion. But that should be easily fixable by just reverting one commit > (3334f7ed5851ef1) in libtool. > I'm afraid I don't understand your second question. Can you elaborate on > that?
Because of the shared toplevel build system, the gcc and src repositories need to have their configure scripts etc. regenerated at the same time for a change such as this (and it should be tested that binutils, newlib and the other directories in the src repository do still build properly after the regeneration). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com