On 2011.10.28 at 15:34 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > > > What about the issues with libtool's notion of sysroots, as mentioned in > > > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02037.html> - have those > > > been resolved, and if so, how? And what about the directories only > > > present in the src repository that will also need updating for such a > > > toplevel change? > > > > Oops, you're right, libtools "with_sysroot" still clashes with gcc's > > notion. But that should be easily fixable by just reverting one commit > > (3334f7ed5851ef1) in libtool. > > I'm afraid I don't understand your second question. Can you elaborate on > > that? > > Because of the shared toplevel build system, the gcc and src repositories > need to have their configure scripts etc. regenerated at the same time for > a change such as this (and it should be tested that binutils, newlib and > the other directories in the src repository do still build properly after > the regeneration).
OK. Although it appears that it was handled in a cascaded fashion the last time: Last gcc update was on : 2009-12-05 Last binutils update : 2010-01-09 -- Markus