On Nov 12 2018, Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> wrote: > Wouldn't this also break compiling code that contains power9 instructions > but guarded by runtime tests to only be executed on power9 machines? That > seems a valid usecase, and it'd be bad if the assembler fails to compile > such. (You can't use -mcpu=power9 as work around as the other > unguarded code is not supposed to be using power9 insns).
You'll need to put .machine directives around them. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."
