On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:02:55PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:34:34PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote: > > On Nov 12, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > For people developing new code, it's the right way to go, and > > > especially so for people working on gcc itself. For people just > > > wanting stuff to compile, not so much. I fully expect a chorus of > > > *MORON* or worse to come from the likes of the linux kernel rabble. > > > > So, if you just want to hear people whine... > > I'm happy to hear other points of view. Ignore my hyperbole. > > > On darwin, we (darwin, as a platform decision) like all instructions > > available from the assembler. > > OK, fair enough. Another option is to just disable -many when gcc is > in development, like we enable checking.
That is a good plan for GCC 9 at least. Segher
