On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 23:04 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Torvald Riegel wrote: > > > Is the attached patch what you'd like to see? It doesn't yet use the > > It's plausible, but really a build system maintainer should look at it. >
So, can we keep this as-is then and fix this after the TM merge (together with the similar bits in libgfortran, libgomp, and libstc ++v3), or is this a stopper? If the latter, could the build system maintainers please look at this soon? Torvald