On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Torvald Riegel wrote: > On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 23:04 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Torvald Riegel wrote: > > > > > Is the attached patch what you'd like to see? It doesn't yet use the > > > > It's plausible, but really a build system maintainer should look at it. > > > > So, can we keep this as-is then and fix this after the TM merge > (together with the similar bits in libgfortran, libgomp, and libstc > ++v3), or is this a stopper?
It would seem reasonable to me to deal with this after the merge - and after Rainer's issues from <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg00915.html> about unused configure checks, Makefile variables etc. are dealt with. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
