On 3/13/19 1:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This PR points out that our P0634 implementation misses constructor parameters and still requires 'typename'. I'm not 100% sure if the standard really says we should also handle constructors. Does a constructor have a function type?
Not that we can ask about, but a constructor declaration is a function declaration.
But I guess it makes sense, so this patch handles it. To handle a constructor in a class, we need to pass flags to cp_parser_constructor_declarator_p. To handle an out-of-line constructor, use constructor_name_p. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
OK. Jason
