On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 3/13/19 1:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > This PR points out that our P0634 implementation misses constructor > > parameters > > and still requires 'typename'. I'm not 100% sure if the standard really > > says > > we should also handle constructors. Does a constructor have a function > > type? > > Not that we can ask about, but a constructor declaration is a function > declaration.
That settles it, then. > > But I guess it makes sense, so this patch handles it. To handle a > > constructor > > in a class, we need to pass flags to cp_parser_constructor_declarator_p. To > > handle an out-of-line constructor, use constructor_name_p. > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? > > OK. Thanks! Marek
