On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Kostya Serebryany <k...@google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:00 PM, <davi...@google.com> wrote: >> >> Have you run through SPEC, and SPEC06 with this change? What is the >> instrumentation overhead using gcc? > > I don't think anyone of us ever run spec with tsan. > Mostly because this will always use the fast path of the tsan analysis (spec > is single-threaded).
I suggested it because It is good for correctness testing, instrumentation (only) overhead testing. David > --kcc >> >> David >> >> http://codereview.appspot.com/5303083/ > >
