> > Bernd provided a fix here about 1 year ago: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00217.html. > > But it is pending to trunk. Here are my humble opinions and hopefully > > we can revive it:
> Yeah. At the time I thought the objections were a bit pointless. At > worst, the added code in some of the target ports is irrelevant, as > admitted by DJ later in the thread, but nothing stops port maintainers > from adding code to disallow -fabi-version for their port. Since none > do > this (AFAIK), I still believe it's best to make all ports behave > identically with this patch. > > So, I still think this patch is the best way to go forward, and it does > fix incorrect code generation. Would appreciate an OK. I agree. I remember reviewing this patch, and being disappointed that it wasn't included. Given my lack of day-to-day involvement in GCC development, I'm not willing to simply say "check it in", but I would encourage reviewers to accept the patch. Mark
