On 11/11/11 17:22, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 11/11/11 16:30, Joey Ye wrote: >> -fstrict-volatile-bitfields doesn't work incorrectly in some cases >> when storing into a volatile bit-field. >> >> Bernd provided a fix here about 1 year ago: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00217.html. >> But it is pending to trunk. Here are my humble opinions and hopefully >> we can revive it: [...] > So, I still think this patch is the best way to go forward, and it does > fix incorrect code generation. Would appreciate an OK.
Ping. Bernd
